This Hugely Popular Country Song Has Surprising Parallels to the Texas Senate Race

It’s tough to pinpoint the exact moment when Ella Langley’s hit single “Choosin’ Texas” grew bigger than country music, bigger than the singer’s starriest aspirations, bigger than the state of Texas itself, but like the universe, its expansion continues.

It’s a history-making smash about a love triangle that finds the 27-year-old country star losing her man to a woman from the Lone Star State. “She’s from Texas,” Langley sings. “I can tell by the way he’s two-stepping ’round the room.” The mild rasp in her voice sounds defeated, deflated. Her twang suggests the rise and fall of a shrug. Her man hasn’t left her yet, but it’s no use. He’s as good as gone. “And judging by the smile that’s written on his face,” Langley concedes, “there’s nothing I can do.”

Since February, “Choosin’ Texas” has been every bit as unstoppable, two-stepping in and out of the No. 1 spot on the Billboard Hot 100, topping the chart for a total of 10 weeks, making it one of the biggest country crossover hits ever. It’s currently holding steady at No. 2 behind a shiny new Taylor Swift single. “Every day I wake up, it’s like something more insane has happened,” Langley, an Alabama native, told Billboard a few months ago.

When any song gets that massive, we start peeking behind the breezy rhythms and golden melodies. We start listening more closely for secret meanings, for cosmic coincidences, for thematic subcurrents whispering to the greater American psyche — or at least for some meaningful parallelisms that might help explain a runaway hit’s sudden exceptionality. With “Choosin’ Texas,” we can probably find our answers in the lyrics alone. Langley is narrating her breakup from the position of a helpless outsider, lamenting the far-off place that’s suddenly created a hole in her life. The geography matters here. She isn’t singing about Montana, or New Hampshire, or Ohio. Langley is anxious about Texas.

Feel familiar? This summer, plenty of Americans are wondering if the fate of our democracy is riding on a U.S. Senate race that most of us won’t vote in. On one side, there’s the Democrat James Talarico, a Texas lawmaker and Presbyterian seminarian with a soothsaying voice that The New Yorker recently described as “civic A.S.M.R. for anyone sick of Donald Trump.” On the other side is Republican Ken Paxton, the state’s attorney general whose endorsement from Trump helped him defeat incumbent Sen. John Cornyn in a gnarly runoff last month. Come November, the implications will be national and long term. Yes, Talarico is trying to flip a reliably red Senate seat, but he’s ultimately trying to awaken the Democratic Party within Texas writ large. After the 2030 Census, Texas is expected to gain four votes in the Electoral College, making it a necessary win for any candidate hoping to reach the White House in 2032 and beyond. None of the rest of us asked for Texas to hold this kind of power over our lives, but, like in the song, here we are.

Maybe it’s a stretch to wonder whether the political influence of the state hums in sync with the uncertain mood of “Choosin’ Texas.” Or maybe it isn’t. Langley obviously didn’t sit down to co-write this indomitable love song as a secret treatise on America’s two-party system. But at this point, “Choosin’ Texas” has gotten so massive, it feels like we can store all kinds of feelings inside of it. Instead of the song fitting the moment, the moment fits inside the song.

***

Sometimes, like Russian nesting dolls, country songs appear within country songs. You can find one in the second verse of “Choosin’ Texas” as Langley scrolls through a playlist, retracing her romantic missteps. “He always loved ‘Amarillo by Morning,’” she sings. “I should have taken that as a warning.”

She’s referring to a George Strait hit from 1982 about Texas wanderlust, chronicling a rodeo rider’s northward overnight journey from San Antonio with nothing but the clothes on his back. “I ain’t rich,” Strait sings in his handsomest sigh, “but Lord, I’m free.” What’s funny is that “Choosin’ Texas” has a much closer cousin in Strait’s “All My Ex’s Live in Texas,” a signature 1987 single in which Texas suddenly shrinks down to something teeny-tiny. “Rosanna’s down in Texarkana,” Strait sings, mapping out a state overpopulated with old flames. “Sweet Eileen’s in Abilene. … Alison’s in Galveston. … And Dimples who now lives in Temple’s got the law looking for me.” Poor George has to decamp to Tennessee, where he can maintain a safe distance.

Americans have long formed our ideas about Texas and its people through country songs like these, trying to comprehend the state’s breadth — politically, spiritually, metaphysically — by parsing the lyrics. But even Texas-born country singers can sound baffled by the state’s sheer size, making it feel unknowable, undefinable. When a 34-year-old Willie Nelson covered Ernest Tubb’s “Waltz Across Texas” way back in 1968, he seemed to be foreshadowing his hippie future, rendering a smitten dance across the state’s 773-mile diameter as something bordering on psychedelic. Then, just last month, country star Kacey Musgraves released “Middle of Nowhere,” a confessional album about retreating to her native Texas in search of inner peace. Where in Texas, exactly? “Out there on the edge of the world, way past common sense,” she sings. “Past the Dairy Queen, the county line, where there ain’t any fences.” Instead of rural comfort, she’s seeking absolute nothingness, and judging by the sad serenity of her voice, she’s found it. For Musgraves, a Texas homecoming is a return to oblivion.

If Texas really is unknowable, we should at least know that it’s cool. “Everyone loves a Texas name-check,” says Natalie Weiner, co-founder of the country music newsletter Don’t Rock the Inbox. “Texas has a very strong brand. … So putting it in the name of your song, or in the lyrics to your song, there’s some instant cachet there.” Weiner, who lives and works in Dallas, sees a certain cred to be gained when contemporary country stars eschew the same old, same old of Nashville to align themselves with the gravitas of Texas. And it isn’t exclusive to country. “I think it’s just kind of sexy, period,” Weiner says of the state’s image in today’s popscape. “I mean, Beyoncé helped with that.”

She definitely did. When the pop superstar announced that she’d be going country on her 2024 album, “Cowboy Carter,” humanity seemed to shout a yeehaw. But when all was said and done on Grammy night 2025 — where “Cowboy Carter” won album of the year — had our collective understanding of Texas really advanced that much? For all its evocations of a whiskey-soaked hoedown, the album’s lead single, “Texas Hold ’Em,” ultimately told us that “this ain’t Texas.”

The ambiguity in these Texas songs can sound like an echo of our confusion over Texas politics. Who are these Texas voters holding our future in their hands? It’s becoming harder and harder to say. “Nobody understands Texas because there is no one Texas,” Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the University of Houston, told me. “[I] go places and people will ask if there are horses in the street, and if we wear cowboy hats and boots to work. The short answer is yes. But the longer answer is, ‘There’s a lot more to it than that.’”

Exponentially more. Texas added more residents in 2025 than any other state, and the most recent census data revealed roughly 40% of the population is Hispanic. “The state is growing in terms of people, and changing significantly in terms of demographics,” Rottinghaus says. “That’s altering the political DNA of the state in ways that we haven’t yet seen the final impacts of.”

We might gain a clearer view of that changing political DNA when voters finally decide between Paxton and Talarico come November. But until Election Day, Texas is keeping us in suspense.

***

The most meaningful friction in “Choosin’ Texas” might have less to do with place and more to do with time. Co-penned with songwriters Luke Dick, Joybeth Taylor and the Texas-born country star Miranda Lambert — Langley and Lambert were unavailable to comment for this story — the song moves at two different speeds: As the lyrics unfold at their languorous tempo, they’re still being sung in the present tense. There’s a subtle urgency in that decision. Her man hasn’t chosen Texas. He’s still choosing. It’s happening right now. We are witnesses, waiting it out, as paralyzed and powerless as Langley. And if we really stretch our brains, that feeling isn’t so different from the sensation of following the Paxton-Talarico race from afar this summer. An election season slog chronicled by a nonstop news cycle. An unseeable, faraway future approaching both fast and slow.

Either way, it’s coming, and people continue to relocate to Texas to be a part of it. “Economic migration has made Texas a symbol of American mobility,” Rottinghaus says. “The Southwest has always been this gold belt buckle that people aspire to. And Texas has become the center of that discussion. So I think that the debate about growth, and identity, and political change are all coming together at a moment where you’ve got competitive politics and the possibility of Texas being the real tipping point, nationally.”

Texas is growing and changing and becoming something even more unknowable than whatever our favorite country singers made us think it was in the first place. In this big song, this big state, this big America, the future remains up for grabs.

Chris Richards is the former pop music critic at The Washington Post.